Seven Deadly Trading Mistakes - Part Three
So far we've looked at how not sticking
to a strategy, and not planning our trading will inevitably
lead us to loss. Now I want to talk about one aspect of
planning in more detail - money management.
You're probably thinking that's a really boring subject, but
before you decide to skip this article, let me say that money
management isn't just about making sure you survive long enough
to turn a profit, it can also open up whole new trading
opportunities to you. Mistake Number Three - Not Understanding
Money Management
There are two distinct sides to this subject, and for some
unknown reason, most people only ever talk about one of those -
survival - or what I call classic money management. It is
hugely important though, so let's cover that right now.
The idea is simple; firstly, we have a pot of money to trade
with. Secondly, as we have established, losses are a part of
trading and so there will be times when the cash in that pot
decreases instead of increasing. Therefore, it stands to reason
that if we don't manage that cash correctly, it is entirely
possible that we lose it all and can no longer trade.
So the concept of classic money management is to trade in such
a way that our losses do not disproportionately affect our
ability to trade. An example will make this clearer:
Assume we have a starting balance of $5000. We want to ensure
that we can survive in this trading game for at least six
months - long enough to prove our strategy and ability, and to
turn a profit. At its simplest, we could say therefore that the
maximum we would allow ourselves to lose each day is $40. If we
hit that limit, we would stop trading for the day. This would
keep us "in the game" for our six months assuming the worst
case scenario of losing every day.
We could expand this money management strategy to say that if
we lost our maximum limit of $40 a day four days in a row, we
wouldn't trade on the fifth day of the week, and if we lost 3
weeks in a row, we wouldn't trade the last week of the month,
and so forth. If we were losing as badly as that, clearly
something would be wrong either with the strategy or our
ability to execute it and so these enforced breaks would offer
a chance to step back and analyse where we were going
wrong.
Assuming a $40 a day maximum loss, it stands to reason that we
could not enter any trade where the possibility for loss was
greater than $40 - to do so would be to expose our account to a
greater loss than is permissible. So our daily limit gives us a
starting point for calculating risk and reward ratios for
actual trading setups.
Knowing beforehand the maximum we can lose in any one day or on
any one trade gives us a huge psychological advantage in our
trading, as well as keeping us in the game for long enough to
allow our strategy to turn a profit.
There is as I mentioned, another side to money management -
position sizing. Many traders will trade fixed position sizes
based on the availability of funds. This is perfectly valid,
but it means that when looking at instruments to trade, they
are inherently limited in what they can trade. Dynamically
adjusting the size of position a trader is willing to take in
relation to the cost of the underlying instrument can open up
whole new trading possibilities.
For a much more detailed explanation, I refer you to an article
I have previously written on the subject, you can find it
here.
Action: In order to give ourselves the best chance of survival
in the market, we must define clear money management rules for
our trading, based on our available capital. Doing so will give
us the added benefits of relieving the psychological pressure
involved in taking losses, and opening up new trading
possibilities that may previously have been thought too
risky.
With our strategy, trading plan, and money management taken
care of, we're ready to trade! In the next article we'll look
at another error that too many traders make in their impatience
to earn big profits.
About the Author
When not trading himself, Harvey Walsh teaches others
how to
trade for profit and freedom.
Article By: Harvey Walsh
|